AAIDD/ARC Position Statements

GUARDIANSHIP
POLICY STATEMENT
The majority of people with mental retardation and related developmental
disabilities can manage their own affairs with informal assistance and
guidance from others, such as family and friends. If guardianship is
necessary, it should be tailored to the person's needs. It must be adequately
monitored to ensure that the best interests of the individual are protected.
ISSUE
The appointment of a guardian is a serious matter because it limits
a person's independence and rights. Guardianship has been over-used by
those who were unaware of less intrusive alternatives or who simply wanted
to have their views prevail over the wishes of the individual. Frequently,
lesser forms of legal intervention such as limited guardianship and use
of powers of attorney have been either overlooked, intentionally avoided,
or unavailable.
POSITION
The majority of our constituents can manage their own affairs with informal
assistance and guidance from family, friends, and others. If guardianship
is essential, it should be used only to the extent necessary with a presumption
in favor of limited rather than full guardianship.
Systems Issues
- Appointment of a guardian should be made only to the extent necessary
for the protection and welfare of the individual and not for the convenience
of the family, the service system, or society.
- Less intrusive alternatives to full guardianship, like limited
guardianship or power of attorney, should always be considered first.
If used at all, these restrictions on the individual's rights and
decision-making powers should be confined to those areas in which
the individual clearly cannot understand the serious consequences
of his or her decisions or the person lacks foresight. · Mechanisms
to reverse unnecessarily restrictive forms of existing guardianship
must be available.
- Since guardianship represents a transfer of the responsibility for
exercising an individual's rights, adequate safeguards, including the
right to counsel, are needed to assure the individual retains as much
decision-making power as possible.
- Members of the judiciary and attorneys need training on alternatives
to guardianship for our constituents
- Individuals placed under guardianship must have legal representation
at all stages of the process and must be informed about the possibility
and the process to have the guardianship removed
Guardian Responsibilities
- They should be knowledgeable of services, supports, and systems
that could significantly affect the life of the individual, and must
be committed to the well-being of the individual, know and understand
the individual's needs and wishes, and act in accordance with them
whenever possible. Family members are preferable when they meet these
criteria.
- They shall take the person's preferences into account.
Oversight
- States should adopt minimum standards for all guardians and require
that training and technical assistance be made available.
- Professional guardians (those who serve two or more wards who are
not related to each other and receive fees) should be licensed, certified,
or registered and should have the appropriate education and skills.
They should not be receiving payment for providing other services to
the ward.
- The guardians shall be accountable for their actions, and those
actions must be reviewed periodically.

Adopted: The Arc, Congress of Delegates, November 9, 2002
AAIDD Board of Directors, May 28, 2002